1. DNA - The more we learn about DNA - the more we undersand - from scientific evidence - that monkeys have always been monkeys and men have always been men. Gametic Isolation prevents one type of living creature from reproducing with another completely different type of creature. There can be variations within species and within types, but one type cannot become another type - as far as our best science tells us today. You can cross a donkey and a horse and get a mule. But they are within the same types. You cannot cross an elephant and a horse however. It is genetically IMPOSSIBLE. This matches with the information contained within Genesis 1. God created them "each after their own kind." Genesis was written 3000 years ago. Just what the very latest Scientific evidence tells us today.

2. ABIOGENESIS - CHEMOSYNTHESIS - SPONTANEOUS GENERATION - (The pseudoscientific idea that all of life originated from non-living material - Big Bang) This is the FOUNDATION of Evolution's theory of the Origin of Life. As much as evolutionists are embarrassed by this today and try desperately to deny that Evolution speaks of the Origins of Life...Alas, they simply cannot deny it. This pseudoscience was disproven scientifically over 200 years ago. Evolution text books declare it proudly and some textbooks on evolution even carry the title "The Origins Of Life." In them, they proudly proclaim abiogenesis as their foundational understanding of life's origins.

BOTONY-3rd Edition by James D. Mauseth - p.517 "The most seriously considered hypothesis about the origins of life is chemosynthesis."

3. LACK OF FOSSIL EVIDENCE - This shell game has been shuffled around a lot lately. After 150 years of looking for the "missing link" (ANY fossil evidence that would clearly and unequivocably prove that one type of animal became another type) there STILL is NONE. This is a huge embarrassment for the evolutionist, especially in light of the fact that we now have over 250 million different fossil specimens recorded.

Dr. Colin Patterson, Senior Paleontologist, British Museum of Nat. History, "I will lay it on the line--there is not one such fossil for which one could make a watertight argument." "It is easy enough to make up stories of how one form gave rise to another. Harper's, Feb. 1984, p.56.

4. WITH FURTHER ADVANCES in our understanding of Atomic Science and Quantum Mechanics - the evolutionist is at a loss to explain the appearance of such building blocks of the universe "accidently." Atoms are non-living entities, yet they are the building blocks of ALL that IS...living and non-living. They and their quantum particles appeared and arranged and re-arranged themselves RANDOMLY into all that IS (living and non living)? A statistical impossibility. If that same evolutionist found a perfectly working watch buried in the sand he would HAVE to say the watch had a creator and was placed there or dropped there. He could NOT say the watch "evolved" from a lower form and got there accidently. The evolutionist will object to this illustration by saying that the watch is a mechanical object and not a living object. Yes...and so are atoms and their subatomic properties. Little non-living "watches" that work perfectly and make up all that IS. Yet, the evolutionist, embarrassingly tells us that all of the atomic elements in the universe arrived here on accident and that they are the product of evolution. Wow, how embarrassing.

"The outstanding evolutionary mystery now is: how matter has originated and evolved, why it has taken its present form in the Universe and on the earth, and why it is capable of forming itself into complex living sets of molecules." C. D. Darlington, Evolution for Naturalists, (NY, John Wiley, 1980) p. 15 English biologist, geneticist and eugenicist, who discovered the mechanics of chromosomal crossover and its role in inheritance.

5. THE EVOLUTIONIST BELIEVES that genetic "mutations" are the "stuff of life and evolution." Actually, genetic mutations HAVE to be the process of life for Evolutionists because of the DNA laws mentioned in number one above. THE PROBLEM? - Every true form of genetic mutation discovered shows that mutations result in a decrease of useful information with horrible results rather than "evolutionary" results.

"To believe that such drastic mutations would produce a viable new type, capable of occupying a new adaptive zone, is equivalent to believing in miracles."Populations, Species, and Evolution p.253. Dr. Ernst Mayr Professor of Zoology at Harvard -He was also a renowned taxonomist, tropical explorer, ornithologist, historian of science, and naturalist.